mk2 vtr vs rover 220turbo Diesel

  1. #1
    Which do you think is quicker, a mk2 vtr or a rover 220 2 litre turbo diesel with a 110 bhp.My mate thinks his rover diesel is quicker than my mk2 vtr, what do you think guys?Im sure mines quicker, and feels well quicker up hills!
  2. #2
    Only one way to find out really.. Take it to a private track session and find out !
    Also , down to driver capability
  3. #3
    depends on what u r basing it on, 0-60? quarter mile? Top speed?
  4. #4
    diesels suck
  5. #5
    you weill probably find he will hand your plumbs to you on a plate if its a race while the cars are in motion. From a standing start i would expect the vtr to win.

    I disagree strongly diesels rock, especially the likes of the golf gttdi 150
  6. #6
    i agree, my vtr is definitly quicker from standing start.his cars cack untill the turbo quicks in at 3200rpm, then it redlines at just 4500, power gone how crap.Sounds like a tracter too!!!!

    had a good race with a 206 gti the otha week. 206 gti wiv 140+ full magnex.there a fair bit quicker than vtrs, but the extra 40 bhp says it all.I think a vts would eat it for dinner, and the 180bhp version2 dontcha think?

    Power2weight n all that!!!!!!!!!
  7. #7
    my dad has a rover 220 turbo diesel and he cant catch for s**t, standin start or if we are already movin, VTR will win everytime
  8. #8
    cheers for that.vtrs kick ass+you aint gonna getta a quicker car for insurance group 7
  9. #9
    my frend has a pug 306 dturbo with a full intercooler, dumnp valve, the works and boy does it shift and hes taking it to fcs 2005 on the track
  10. #10
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by evo6
    cheers for that.vtrs kick ass+you aint gonna getta a quicker car for insurance group 7
    Civic 1.6 sport my maw and dad has, think it's only a group 6, and is as fast if not faster. (vtech)

    Looks wise, it's the same as the CTR apart from the wheels.

    Correct me if this is wrong.