Which do you think is quicker, a mk2 vtr or a rover 220 2 litre turbo diesel with a 110 bhp.My mate thinks his rover diesel is quicker than my mk2 vtr, what do you think guys?Im sure mines quicker, and feels well quicker up hills!
mk2 vtr vs rover 220turbo Diesel
-
#1
-
#2Only one way to find out really.. Take it to a private track session and find out !
Also , down to driver capability -
#3depends on what u r basing it on, 0-60? quarter mile? Top speed?
-
#4diesels suck
-
#5you weill probably find he will hand your plumbs to you on a plate if its a race while the cars are in motion. From a standing start i would expect the vtr to win.
I disagree strongly diesels rock, especially the likes of the golf gttdi 150 -
#6i agree, my vtr is definitly quicker from standing start.his cars cack untill the turbo quicks in at 3200rpm, then it redlines at just 4500, power gone how crap.Sounds like a tracter too!!!!
had a good race with a 206 gti the otha week. 206 gti wiv 140+ full magnex.there a fair bit quicker than vtrs, but the extra 40 bhp says it all.I think a vts would eat it for dinner, and the 180bhp version2 dontcha think?
Power2weight n all that!!!!!!!!!
-
#7my dad has a rover 220 turbo diesel and he cant catch for s**t, standin start or if we are already movin, VTR will win everytime
-
#8cheers for that.vtrs kick ass+you aint gonna getta a quicker car for insurance group 7
-
#9my frend has a pug 306 dturbo with a full intercooler, dumnp valve, the works and boy does it shift and hes taking it to fcs 2005 on the track
-
#10Civic 1.6 sport my maw and dad has, think it's only a group 6, and is as fast if not faster. (vtech)Quote:Originally Posted by evo6cheers for that.vtrs kick ass+you aint gonna getta a quicker car for insurance group 7
Looks wise, it's the same as the CTR apart from the wheels.
Correct me if this is wrong.