I've been thinking about springz n shit y0
I did make an excel sheet with everyones custom faulkners, aftermarket springs on etc, with a graph to show the correlation between length, rate and ride height. This was many yonks ago. I then thought hmm why not use a bit of theory.
For this theory to work the springs need to be under no tension with the dampers fully extended, so say a 240mm spring with grpN billies/pugsport tarmacs.
Take a few examples to work from.
A saxo weighs 920kg or thereabouts.
Front end weighs 540 or something
Rear weighs 380 etc.
So one side at the front weighs about 270kg. 270kg = 595lb, call it 600lb.
Take spring A. This is 200lb/in and 240mm, this lowers the car(A standard vts) by 20-30mm, a known quantity.
The maximum extended length of the damper piston to the bottom of the top mount thread is approximately 190mm on both damper designs. So this is your amount of travel(ignoring the bump stops because they won't affect ride height, if you are low enough to be sitting on the bump stops at ride height you need to modify them so you don't). So anyway yeah. You drop the car onto the ground, your 200lb/in spring will compress by an inch for every 200lb of weight you put on it.
So you drop the car down. The damper travel moves approximately 75mm from extended, leaving 105mm travel. It has moved by 3" which is 75mm, 600lb compresses a 200lb/in spring by 3 inches. voila, magic.
So if you were to make some(poofdahs) 160lb/in springs, they would compress by(600lb/160) = 3.75 = 93mm. Take 90mm from your 180 and you end with 90mm travel remaining, this is 15mm lower than your 20-30mm springs, so 35-45mm below standard ride height.
Or you are one hardcore motherlover, you made some 250lb springs, and they would lower la voiture par(600/250) = 2.4" = 60mm. This leaves 120mm of travel, this is 15mm more than our 20-30mm springs, leaving 5-15mm lowering from standard ride height.
And here endeth the lesson for today
I did make an excel sheet with everyones custom faulkners, aftermarket springs on etc, with a graph to show the correlation between length, rate and ride height. This was many yonks ago. I then thought hmm why not use a bit of theory.
For this theory to work the springs need to be under no tension with the dampers fully extended, so say a 240mm spring with grpN billies/pugsport tarmacs.
Take a few examples to work from.
A saxo weighs 920kg or thereabouts.
Front end weighs 540 or something
Rear weighs 380 etc.
So one side at the front weighs about 270kg. 270kg = 595lb, call it 600lb.
Take spring A. This is 200lb/in and 240mm, this lowers the car(A standard vts) by 20-30mm, a known quantity.
The maximum extended length of the damper piston to the bottom of the top mount thread is approximately 190mm on both damper designs. So this is your amount of travel(ignoring the bump stops because they won't affect ride height, if you are low enough to be sitting on the bump stops at ride height you need to modify them so you don't). So anyway yeah. You drop the car onto the ground, your 200lb/in spring will compress by an inch for every 200lb of weight you put on it.
So you drop the car down. The damper travel moves approximately 75mm from extended, leaving 105mm travel. It has moved by 3" which is 75mm, 600lb compresses a 200lb/in spring by 3 inches. voila, magic.
So if you were to make some(poofdahs) 160lb/in springs, they would compress by(600lb/160) = 3.75 = 93mm. Take 90mm from your 180 and you end with 90mm travel remaining, this is 15mm lower than your 20-30mm springs, so 35-45mm below standard ride height.
Or you are one hardcore motherlover, you made some 250lb springs, and they would lower la voiture par(600/250) = 2.4" = 60mm. This leaves 120mm of travel, this is 15mm more than our 20-30mm springs, leaving 5-15mm lowering from standard ride height.
And here endeth the lesson for today


