yet another 'what 4-2-1 manifold do I get?' thread - help please!

  1. #1
    OK, I've been reading all the recent threads on 4-2-1 manifolds which has left me confused tbh as they all seem to give conflicting information. From what I gather these are the major producers of 4-2-1 mannis:

    Raceland - cheap, with poor build quality. likely to blow a hole/not last very long. However, very popular.

    Supersprint - expensive, excellent build quality.

    Milltek - not much info.

    Janspeed - expensive, sometimes poor build quality/welds. Other than that, not much info.

    GMC - haven't found much on this manni.

    I have a mk2 vts with a powerflow backbox system - what 4-2-1 manifold should I get? Are Raceland as bad as the majority seem to make out?

    Also, to fit the manifold, will i have to remove anything from the existing setup, and will the car pass it's mot? Will I need a new centre section?

    Help here, not sure what I need. I'm fairly competent with spanners so will most likely fit it myself.

    Cheers TIA
  2. #2
    Quote:
    Also, to fit the manifold, will i have to remove anything from the existing setup, and will the car pass it's mot? Will I need a new centre section?
    VTS cats are always under the car so will pass mot no problem.

    I have a raceland on my VTR and it has being fine, doesnt blow and made the car more raspy and a lot more responsive. In the way of gains they are all very very similar so that shouldnt really affect your decision.
  3. #3
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by makaveli144 View Post
    VTS cats are always under the car so will pass mot no problem.

    I have a raceland on my VTR and it has being fine, doesnt blow and made the car more raspy and a lot more responsive. In the way of gains they are all very very similar so that shouldnt really affect your decision.

    So basically its a straight fitment of the 4-2-1 mannifold? no removing any of the undersection, or moving any other bits? Sounds too good to be true...
  4. #4
    GMC no questions asked imo.
  5. #5
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by williamsvts View Post
    GMC no questions asked imo.
    Based on what? More power over the others?
  6. #6
    better build quility and better designed imo, just an overall better manifold.
  7. #7
    what kind of power gains do u expext to get with a manifold? 10 bhp?
  8. #8
    anyone?
  9. #9
    Quote:
    So basically its a straight fitment of the 4-2-1 mannifold? no removing any of the undersection, or moving any other bits? Sounds too good to be true...
    Basically yes, not sure but you may have to move the oil filter though.

    I think 10bhp optimistic, probably about 7.
  10. #10
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by williamsvts View Post
    GMC no questions asked imo.
    And where can i get one from?

    Echo the question above, is there really much of a performance gain or is it just noise?
  11. #11
    hudson you would need to contact GMC, GMC manifold is 4-1 not 421 and it is all explained here http://www.gmcmotorsport.co.uk/index...age=page&id=30
  12. #12
    GMC only do 4-1 iirc

    i have the same dilema atm

    raceland for about £150-200
    or supersprint for abour £300

    think ill just go with raceland tbh, the difference cant be much and if you have it fitted profesionally should be ok
  13. #13
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by makaveli144 View Post
    hudson you would need to contact GMC, GMC manifold is 4-1 not 421 and it is all explained here http://www.gmcmotorsport.co.uk/index...age=page&id=30
    Well 4-1's are for high end gains correct? And 4-2-1 are for all through the range gains, perhaps better gains low down. For this reason I think they might be better suited to the vts power delivery.
  14. #14
    4-1 better suited to vts imo

    higher up revs for 4-1, vts kicks in higher up the rev range also

    suited

    i have 4-1 gmc
  15. #15
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by hudson701 View Post
    Well 4-1's are for high end gains correct? And 4-2-1 are for all through the range gains, perhaps better gains low down. For this reason I think they might be better suited to the vts power delivery.
    You can't use such a simplified rule.. the raceland gets gains at low revs, medium and top end..
  16. #16
    i have ashley 4-2-1 mild steel manifold it seems to do the trick
  17. #17
    yorkie you have vtr
  18. #18
    This is how I have always seen it

    4-2-1 works good on a VTR

    4-1 I still I think is best suited to a VTS

    Between me and 2 other mates we have had pretty much had every manifold and all stand by the GMC as being the best.
  19. #19
    i got the raceland 4-2-1 and im happy with it, good power cheap and quality isnt that bad tbh.
  20. #20
    mmmm....tempted by a 4-1 now going by what people have said. Is there much of price difference between a 4-1 and a 4-2-1? What about fitment, any issues there?
  21. #21
    get a piper 4 - 1 there spot on both me and my mate have them.
  22. #22
    all in all get what you thinks best, mines cammed and revs well top end with a 4-1
  23. #23
    do piper do 4-1's for a mk2 vts?
  24. #24
    yeah piper do 4-1's for a mk2 vts, u have to giv em a call though.
  25. #25
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SaXo_vtr123 View Post
    yeah piper do 4-1's for a mk2 vts, u have to giv em a call though.
    we sell most of the manifolds in the list above.

    Don't quite agree with the summary in the first post though.

    For piper etc
    http://www.kamracing.co.uk/citroen-s...0/manifold-38/

    Certainly regarding the build quality of the raceland they aren't as easy to fit and the finishing is sometime a little rough but none that we've sold have fallen apart. They come with a guarantee for a few years too.
  26. #26
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by KamRacing View Post
    Don't quite agree with the summary in the first post though.
    OK, then please correct me. What is your view of the manifolds?

    I'm looking for a new manifold to give the best possible 0 - 60/80mph performance, rather than top end gains. Reason being is that in everyday driving you're not going to be doing 100+mph, so modifications which only show a real benefit at these types of higher speeds are wasted IMO (on the road, anyway).

    As I said earlier, advice is welcome.