Saxo vtr-better than c2 vts

  1. L-plater Joined: Oct 2008 croatia-zagreb Posts: 96 citroen saxo vtr-in my country it is also vts but
    #1
    I raced yesterday with c2 vts and he was in front of me when we were going straight but not much and then came the curves.i thought of buying that car but yesterday i got smarter when i saw that c2 is piece of s**t driving curves.someone please correct me if i am wrong?is it the car or the driver.
  2. Saxperience Post Whore Joined: Feb 2005 Billericay, Essex (England) Posts: 6774 1.1.1i, 2.Mk2 VTR 3.Astra SRI 150
    #2
    c2 will be heavier than a saxo. might have an effect on performance. otherwise it would be the driver
  3. Saxperience Hardcore! Joined: Mar 2008 Posts: 31279 Citroen Saxo VTS, S60 D5
    #3
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by croatvts View Post
    I raced yesterday
    private land ?? , or are your limits in crotia different

    EDIT : lol below
  4. Saxperience Hardcore! Joined: Apr 2008 Bedford & Manchester Posts: 17504
    #4
    u iz well bad street racin blud.. FAIL

    after reading your avatar its hard to understand which car you actually own.. 8v? or 16v?
  5. Frequent Poster Joined: Nov 2006 Lincoln Posts: 908 Wicked Red VTS
    #5
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ashleyp View Post
    u iz well bad street racin blud.. FAIL

    after reading your avatar its hard to understand which car you actually own.. 8v? or 16v?
    i think in some countries (such as croatia where he is from) the vtr is named the vts and the vts is called the caxo cup, i think lol
  6. Saxperience Hardcore! Joined: Oct 2005 Aycliffe Posts: 32205 Saxo VTS
    #6
    c2 vts is quite a bit weightier than the Saxo. It also has a higher CoG compared to that if that Saxo which does have a slight effect on the handling however citroen have done pretty well to minimise the loss of funfactor.

    The C2 has to meet a whole more stricter EU requirments which ultimately means a compromise to the vehicle. As a result, the c2 vts has performance levels inbetween the Saxo vtr and Saxo vts

    Ads
  7. Frequent Poster Joined: Oct 2008 Republic Of Linwood.. Posts: 855 green phase 1 vts
    #7
    iv driven a c2 vts and i though it was pish tbh..
  8. Saxperience Hardcore! Joined: Oct 2005 Aycliffe Posts: 32205 Saxo VTS
    #8
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ally-vts View Post
    iv driven a c2 vts and i though it was pish tbh..
    same... you kind of expect the next level of 'saxoness' yet its about a far from it as you can get. shame.
  9. L-plater Joined: Oct 2008 croatia-zagreb Posts: 96 citroen saxo vtr-in my country it is also vts but
    #9
    i dont know.i expected that that car goes faster
  10. Infrequent Poster Joined: Jul 2006 Skopje Posts: 215 Citroen Saxo 1.6-16V VTS
    #10
    Do you drive a VTS-16v or VTR-8v? becouse VTS is 120bhp and VTR is 90bhp.
  11. Frequent Poster Joined: Nov 2006 Lincoln Posts: 908 Wicked Red VTS
    #11
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by vlatko_vts View Post
    Do you drive a VTS-16v or VTR-8v? becouse VTS is 120bhp and VTR is 90bhp.
    read what i put above
  12. Newbie Joined: Jul 2008 nottinghamshire Posts: 24 saxo vts
    #12
    got a mate with a c2 vts and is know where near as fun as my saxo vts, c2 dont handle as well either
  13. Established Member Joined: Sep 2008 Torbay Posts: 1565 2000 phase 2 Saxo VTS Turbo 2000 Nissan 200sx S14a
    #13
    highly disappointed with the c2vts, i thought it was pretty toss to be honest. also, you can slam them to the floor but they still look high because the roof sits so high. it was a design that wouldn't ever take off like the saxo did.
  14. Regular Poster Joined: Dec 2007 Posts: 434
    #14
    i had a c2 vts a short while after i sold the saxo vts and was VERY disappointed by everything really

    the performance was well below the saxo vts and even thou is has 5bhp more that the saxo you tend to feel as if your drivin a furio lol (sorry to all furio owners)

    the only thing i believe to be an advantage in the c2 vts was the pedal space you had everything else was bad imo

    and the c2 vts' are well overpriced so if you got the money to buy one of them why not go out and buy a well looked after saxo vts and use the extra cash to modd it

    saxo's looks better imo than a c2
  15. Established Member Joined: Jul 2007 Hampshire Posts: 1603
    #15
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ashleyp View Post
    u iz well bad street racin blud.. FAIL

    after reading your avatar its hard to understand which car you actually own.. 8v? or 16v?
    have u always gotta sarcy comment to peoples posts? u do it all over the forum. no need.
    3 users thanked this post: , ,
  16. Established Member Joined: Feb 2008 bedfordshire Posts: 1681 audi a3
    #16
    ^^^ lol
  17. Saxperience Addict Joined: Jun 2006 Wirral Posts: 13584 Wickerd red VTS MK2, Two tone VTS MK2,vvc Metro..
    #17
    [QUOTE=croatvts;2661784]Ide never change me mk2 vts for c2!! there bloody horrible..............
  18. Newbie Joined: Oct 2008 pontefract Posts: 8 corsa sport mg zr saxo vtr mk2
    #18
    my friend has a c2 and his car lets say handles like a boat compared to a saxo
  19. Frequent Poster Joined: Oct 2004 Cambs Posts: 630 Vts track car
    #19
    C2 is a more than capable car with the correct setup, but the saxo is a more agile car with a much better power to weight ratio.

    Unfortunately these days new cars have much stricter safety rules so the extra safety features make the car so much heavier.

    I know someone who races a c2 in stock hatch running a good 40bhp more than the saxos, but because of the extra weight they are pretty much on par.