Are Powerflow full s/steel exhausts any good performance wise, or are they more aimed at asthetics??

|
i was also in formed by them that i would have a 10 percent power increase if i purchased there cat back system. on a vts= 120 ish out of the factory+ 10 percent= 132 just from a cat back exhaust. BOLLOCKS! mine is a cammed vts with all breathing mods and PH3 cams and its 136.5 @ fly. So you can see how far out there claims are
|
|
without causing any offence mate i find it abit hard to believe tbh. the reason i say this is the results from the yorkshire rolling road day. i came 3rd out of the 9 french cars that ran that day which i was happy with. on the day i got 131.8 @fly. i went back a couple of days later with a 350 KPA fuel pressure regulator instead of 300 KPA and a de restricted air intake and i made 136.5 @ fly (unmapped standard ecu). nij had the most powerful of the day with 149 @fly on his standard ecu. that was with with head work, ph3 cams, polished throttle body, 4 branch, de cat and a magnex cat back. hence why im doubting your claims mate. im not intending to slag your car off at all im just really curious as to how you got a figure like that from an exhaust and no air box. a couple of people with similar mods to your self came out with 118- 124 ish BHP @ fly. i would of made more if my fueling wasny horrendous tbh. my car needs mapping big time
|
|
No offence taken..feel free to pop down anytime and see it run on the rollers lol. 'Toad' has been on these rollers before, he and alot of other people actually think they read a bit low.
Have you not considered your engine running poorly? serviced it recently? rings on there way out? throttle body nice and clean? |
|
i dont think so. did you have a power run before and after? also what reg is your vts? th reason i ask is W reg vts or vts around that age had single plug ECUS but had the head of a later vts which had the prongs on for the exhaust gas recirculation valve, but they had no valve. these had more poer out of the factory for some reason, approx 130 ish standard.
|
|
You wont ever have all of them being the same, they are a guide figure, some will read slightly higher some lower (the joys of tollerances)
but the 130bhp thing was a rumour started many many moons ago, mostly turned into a pisstake lol |
|
engine is mint at the min. the throttle body has been ported and polished so its very clean, it was serviced a couple of months ago and the rings are fine. (2002 vts 70000 miles on it) running like a dream apart from it needs mapping which is hopefully getting done tomoz
|
|
just because yours made shit power for its spec doesnt mean everyone elses will, mine made 153 and 150 on 2 seperate rollers with breathing mods and 708s.
and its bollocks about them cars having more power. also saxos have never ever ever had an EGR valve fitted. mine also made 134 with backbox, decat, manifold and simota filter many moons ago so his is very believable. |

|
You wont ever have all of them being the same, they are a guide figure, some will read slightly higher some lower (the joys of tollerances)
but the 130bhp thing was a rumour started many many moons ago, mostly turned into a pisstake lol |
|
Graph is on the computer database i will have to get it printed out and scanned |



|
there was never a vts 130 version, i admit that is a chinese whisper.
|
|
emerald indeed. We are testing the loom etc atm.
It worked fantastically then one day, misfiring/overfueling, wouldnt maintain idle etc etc.. now it wont start and on emerald software keeps having strange readings like 100% throttle when there isnt, and we have tried a new TPS aswell!!! Alex is playing with it alot atm just alot of head scratching atm lol |