remap

1. johnlambert Saxperience Forum Bum Joined: Mar 2009 Dublin Posts: 4359 Honda S2000

   #1 12th May 2009, 23:39

   is a remap from 75 bhp to 83 bhp a good one??
   (westie saxo)
2. Matt67 Saxperience Forum Bum Joined: Aug 2008 Kent Posts: 2653 1.6 16v C2 GT

   #2 12th May 2009, 23:48

   Depends what mods you have done.
3. titchster Saxperience Forum Bum Joined: Jan 2008 Down't road from Sheffield Posts: 4641 Was:16v 106 XS ..... Now: Import 1.8 MX5

   #3 13th May 2009, 00:19

   Pointless remapping an otherwise standard car. Gains aren't worth the money.
4. Ferg Saxperience Forum Bum Joined: Jun 2007 Maidstone, Kent Posts: 4928 Clio 197 Cup

   #4 13th May 2009, 00:20

   ^^ Agreed ... Not worth it on that engine.
5. johnlambert Saxperience Forum Bum Joined: Mar 2009 Dublin Posts: 4359 Honda S2000

   #5 13th May 2009, 00:59

   i plan on getting new cams,throttle b,decat ect. or will i get these 1st?
6. frankie Saxperience Addict Joined: Apr 2006 Frome, down deepest, darkest zummerset Posts: 12971 VTRallye

   #6 13th May 2009, 01:00

   do the mod's first, then remap
7. Sparco_Tom Saxperience Addict Joined: Jan 2007 Aylesbury, Bucks Posts: 12836 Yeaaahh Fiesta

   #7 13th May 2009, 01:13

   mods then remap,a remap is expensive and should be only done after having a cam and breathing mods to justify the cost, would be more cost effective to swap engines
8. johnlambert Saxperience Forum Bum Joined: Mar 2009 Dublin Posts: 4359 Honda S2000

   #8 13th May 2009, 12:16

   so engine swap would jus be better?
   need a cheap vts engine though
9. williamsvts Saxperience Post Whore Joined: Feb 2006 northumberland Posts: 7693 pulsar gtir, mk4 astra sxi

   #9 13th May 2009, 12:29

   if you can afford to buy all them parts, then why ge a cheap vts engine? the cost of them mods will be way above a 16v engine.