bigger cc

  1. #1
    does anyone know what bottom end and off what you could put onto a vtr blacktop? something like a 1.8 or 1.9?? and what it intails??

    just curious trhats all

    many thanks
  2. #2
    as an upgrade for bigger cc i mean sorry
  3. #3
    you can buy 1800cc stroker kits. not cheap.

    or you can fit different engine
  4. #4
    You cant just bung on a random bottom end tbh, the TU range is quite small the bigger engines are from a different family.
  5. #5
    somrthing like a xantia bottom end or xcanta ??

    would they work and would you get gains worth doing???
  6. #6
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by biggee1988 View Post
    somrthing like a xantia bottom end or xcanta ??

    would they work and would you get gains worth doing???
    no mate, completly different engine.


    only ways really are stroker kits or fit a different engine. no cheap or easy way round this.
  7. #7
    if you get a bigger engine itl cost crap loads in fabrications etc.
    plus itl be heavier and wont get full lock and a whole lot of crap.
    bigger cc = stroker kit like already said really.
  8. #8
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by littleracer View Post
    if you get a bigger engine itl cost crap loads in fabrications etc.
    plus itl be heavier and wont get full lock and a whole lot of crap.
    bigger cc = stroker kit like already said really.
    what about b18 engine? thats lighter yet more cc. so is a rover k-series (1.8) and also ford duratec... all these engines are lighter yet more cc. they are not however a ametuer fit and require a LOT of custom work
  9. #9
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by littleracer View Post
    if you get a bigger engine itl cost crap loads in fabrications etc.
    plus itl be heavier and wont get full lock and a whole lot of crap.
    bigger cc = stroker kit like already said really.
    Not alllways the case. The issues with the full lock is usually down to the gearbox being used (so gti-6 conversions).

    Not all of the bigger cc engines are massively heavy, some of the newer ones dont weigh an awful lot more, KAM had the specs of the weights on them not that long ago.
  10. #10
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by dannygti View Post
    what about b18 engine? thats lighter yet more cc. so is a rover k-series (1.8) and also ford duratec... all these engines are lighter yet more cc. they are not however a ametuer fit and require a LOT of custom work
    i was mainly comparing to the xsarah 2l lump which if iirc is heavier.

    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ryan View Post
    Not alllways the case. The issues with the full lock is usually down to the gearbox being used (so gti-6 conversions).

    Not all of the bigger cc engines are massively heavy, some of the newer ones dont weigh an awful lot more, KAM had the specs of the weights on them not that long ago.
    yeah the gearbox is longer then the MA ones so is alot of work/fabrication.
  11. #11
    got a 1.3 engine you can have... and lets jsut say you'll be knobbing the majority of cars in the road, not jsut other lil boy racers around your town
    small, can be easily modded, and modded Heavily!

    hayabusa FTW!
  12. #12
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by littleracer View Post

    yeah the gearbox is longer then the MA ones so is alot of work/fabrication.
    Just use the 5speed.
  13. #13
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ryan View Post
    Just use the 5speed.
    xsarah engine can only use BA gearbox IIRC?

    can GTI-6 engine use MA box?
  14. #14
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by littleracer View Post
    xsarah engine can only use BA gearbox IIRC?

    can GTI-6 engine use MA box?
    BE boxes, the xsara and gti-6 are effectively very similar.

    No it cant as the GTi-6 isnt a TU is it

    Theres a few gti-6 engined cars out there running 5speed BEs.
  15. #15
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ryan View Post
    BE boxes, the xsara and gti-6 are effectively very similar.

    No it cant as the GTi-6 isnt a TU is it

    Theres a few gti-6 engined cars out there running 5speed BEs.
    ah cool,so does GTI-6 engine need re fabricated mounts like xsarah,iam guessing yes.

    sorry for thread hi jack btyw lolz.
  16. #16
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by littleracer View Post
    ah cool,so does GTI-6 engine need re fabricated mounts like xsarah,iam guessing yes.

    sorry for thread hi jack btyw lolz.
    Yes of course it does, its the same family, so will have engine mounts in different positions to that of the TU. Any decent fabricator can do the work though, ryan cooke had a nice xsara rallye on RR although i dont know if he ever finished it.
    1 user thanked this post:
  17. #17
    why bother with a bigger engine when after fabricating costs you could get a booooost setup
  18. #18
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Hewitt20 View Post
    why bother with a bigger engine when after fabricating costs you could get a booooost setup
    Because you can poot a bigger engine in then add boost to that
  19. #19
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by AXracing View Post
    Because you can poot a bigger engine in then add boost to that
    hehe




    i really do want to see some people doing different things.
    we are miles behind all the other car "marques" in terms of tuning and engine conversions. i can only think of a handful of 106/saxo's that use different engines.

    i myself will be doing something very different, even if i dont know what it is yet lol
  20. #20
    Yeah but they all have epic engine bays and massive engine ranges to choose from
  21. #21
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ben_Saxo View Post
    Yeah but they all have epic engine bays and massive engine ranges to choose from
    i can think of several engines that are plenty small and compact enough to fit in our bays...

    you see 20v turbo engined renault 5's, v-tec mini's, v8 engined westfields etc.
    we have plenty space to work with.
  22. #22
    Relatively simple engine swaps are the PSA XU range and the Rover K series. Possibly some of the other rover engines that are the same format as the K series.

    A little more complicated to fit but a engine with great potential is the 2.0 or 2.3 Mazda/Ford Duratec. Not as simple to fit but a totally standard engine with carbs for throttle bodies strapped on with give you over 200bhp out of the 2.0 and is bomb proof. Its also a very common and cheap engine.
  23. #23
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by AXracing View Post
    Relatively simple engine swaps are the PSA XU range and the Rover K series. Possibly some of the other rover engines that are the same format as the K series.

    A little more complicated to fit but a engine with great potential is the 2.0 or 2.3 Mazda/Ford Duratec. Not as simple to fit but a totally standard engine with carbs for throttle bodies strapped on with give you over 200bhp out of the 2.0 and is bomb proof. Its also a very common and cheap engine.
    i agree, the k-series being one of the lightest engines in its class is a great option in my eyes.

    i use/build tb'd duratec engines at work all the time to go into the westfields.. they are very light and compact and like you say produce great power. a friend has a 2.0 duratec with a paul dunnel engine in his westie and it has 298bhp n/a..... shows theres plenty potential.

    honda engines will be making their way into 106/saxo's soon
  24. #24
    How much of an arse is it in wiring terms? Can you just bring all the fuseboxes and dials etc across, power and earth everything up and jobs a goodun? Must be difficult to get heaters to work etc?
  25. #25
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Ben_Saxo View Post
    How much of an arse is it in wiring terms? Can you just bring all the fuseboxes and dials etc across, power and earth everything up and jobs a goodun? Must be difficult to get heaters to work etc?
    you just try and use as much as the saxo/106 loom as possible then make up a engine harness to suit.. (not as simple but thats the idea) if things become a ball ache then just invest in standalone ecu.
  26. #26
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by dannygti View Post
    you just try and use as much as the saxo/106 loom as possible then make up a engine harness to suit.. (not as simple but thats the idea) if things become a ball ache then just invest in standalone ecu.
    Or just go standalone, on a honda engine with boddies & 9k rpm... Mmmmmmmmm
  27. #27
    its probably a muchness of muchness over the cost of a stroker kit or a different engine, but with an engine change you will most certainly need to factor in an alternate ecu, fabrication work etc.
    The stroker kit is a wicked bit of kit, I reckon 220+ n/a is very easy to achieve, and a forced induction version would be pretty trick.

    Kev
  28. #28
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by KamRacing View Post
    its probably a muchness of muchness over the cost of a stroker kit or a different engine, but with an engine change you will most certainly need to factor in an alternate ecu, fabrication work etc.
    The stroker kit is a wicked bit of kit, I reckon 220+ n/a is very easy to achieve, and a forced induction version would be pretty trick.

    Kev
    Are you talking about the TU engine Kev? and with which cams? would it still have any midrange left?!! lol