compression ratio and cams

  1. #1
    right oh lads i over heard a conversation the other day which basically went like this "you cant advance ph3's fully to get the best from them due to piston/valve clearences becoming to risky."

    1st question: is that true or have does it have any truth to it?

    2nd question (head hurter): if i were to get my standard pistons machined on the valve cut-outs say by 2mm it will lower the C/R not by much but it will then to compensate i would have to get my head skimmed.
    how much would i need to get my head skimmed by to get to the standard C/R back. or would the difference not make any differences.
  2. #2
    I don't believe the 1st statement is true. The cams are designed to run on stock valve / piston clearances too.

    You can only skim the head so much, as you'll literally have no combusiton chamber left.

    Better off getting larger hi-comp pistons and a re-bore, then fitting some proper cams.
  3. #3
    ph4 has issues i belive but ph3 iirc is fine? and with that small a machining it wouldnt make much diff tbh, but could compensate by getting a slighlty larger h/g, machining the head right down will be basically defeating the purpose of pocketed pistons.....
  4. #4
    what thickness is a standard head gasket?
  5. #5
    the standard is 1.5, but can get headgasket smaller or bigger no problem,

    andy
  6. #6
    iirc its in the jp4 if you run j4 ph3s (i heard it for 708s) at high revs it can be close like
  7. #7
    yes higher the rev to closer it will be, but if everything still standard i.e. the head hasnt be skimmed and the headgasket is the same size you shouldnt have a problem, but the clearance get closer if you skim the head,

    but if should be ok.

    andy