mk1 vtr bottom end plus mk2 head = higher compression!!! OBVIOUSLEY!!!!

1. blackie_2k5 Saxperience Hardcore! Joined: Oct 2008 Birtley Posts: 22253 VTR Turbo, 106 xsi track slag, Transit recovery, B

   #1 3rd January 2010, 20:01

   ffs egay is unreal!!! literally lol'd at this then emailed the guy to warn him he could get sued for writting that and his reply was
   "prove the compression of that engine then we'll talk buddy"
   which is a fair comment tbh but still there is no truth to this what so ever!!!
   
   
   http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.d...id=p2761.l1259
   
   faster then standard mk1's and two's innit blud!!
2. Predator_R32p Super Moderator Joined: Mar 2003 Durham (England) Posts: 37932 1. AX 2. Mk2 Saxo VTR 3. MK4 R32 DBP

   #2 3rd January 2010, 20:53

   What a loser
3. roosie L-plater Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 37

   #3 16th January 2010, 13:55

   Hes got it the wrong way round Mk2 bottom end and mk1 head raises the compression. this is the combination we use in stock hatch championship most of our cars are running 125-135bhp