Stroking a 1.1

  1. #1
    Afternoon,

    For a side project and something to p**s about doing for a few weeks im looking to rebuild my spare 1.1 engine. Been trawling about looking for ideas and i've been wondering if I could use the crank or con rods from the 1.4 engine?

    The reason for this thought is that according to the haynes manual they both have the same bearing diameter so in theory the con rods from the 1.4 should fit the 1.1 crank. any advice/info on this would be appriciate.

    FYI if my calcs are correct this shoudl give the equivilant of a 125cc increase to bring the 1124 up to 1249
  2. #2
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by FunkyDave View Post
    Afternoon,

    For a side project and something to p**s about doing for a few weeks im looking to rebuild my spare 1.1 engine. Been trawling about looking for ideas and i've been wondering if I could use the crank or con rods from the 1.4 engine?

    The reason for this thought is that according to the haynes manual they both have the same bearing diameter so in theory the con rods from the 1.4 should fit the 1.1 crank. any advice/info on this would be appriciate.

    FYI if my calcs are correct this shoudl give the equivilant of a 125cc increase to bring the 1124 up to 1249
    worth the hassle for an extra 125cc?

    why not push the boat out and make a 16v 1.1/1.4
  3. #3
    Wont be too much hassel(i think) was hoping to whip the sum cover off and then see if i could change the con rods without taking the head off. From what i can see the 16v head wouldn't fit on as the bore is a fair whack too big and would need some beefed up wet liners at the head while keeping them the same lower down.
  4. #4
    block heights are different so you would need to machine the block and liners down a cost in itself not worth it unless you can get it done for FA.
  5. #5
    if im not mistaken the cc is all in the cylinders? and only way to increase the cc is by boring out the cylinders, increasing capacity? so it dont matter what con rods or crank u use the cc stays the same?
  6. #6
    Engine displacement is determined from the bore and stroke of an engine's cylinders. The bore is the diameter of the circular chambers cut into the cylinder block.



  7. #7
    could just fit a 1.4 engine
    1 user thanked this post:
  8. #8
    for what you would gain and to notice any difference why not just stick a vts lump in
  9. #9
    won,t fit --what you are trying to do was done by citroen +pug ,itwas the ax sport engine 1294cc--used funny storke crank +rods +pistons +liners .
    rev to the moon .
    no the bits you are talking about won,t just fit ,
    1 user thanked this post:
  10. #10
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by axsaxoman View Post
    won,t fit --what you are trying to do was done by citroen +pug ,itwas the ax sport engine 1294cc--used funny storke crank +rods +pistons +liners .
    rev to the moon .
    no the bits you are talking about won,t just fit ,

    152bhp your old one wasn't it john?
  11. #11
    Bugger it, i'll fit a 1.4 then. Any one got one goin cheap?
  12. #12
    they are cheap anyway mate have a look on ebay
  13. #13
    you'll pick one up for a bout £50! i paid £40 for a westcoast engine
  14. #14
    so which would be the best 1.4 to go for? and would it be worth looking at 106 1.4's aswell?
  15. #15
    pug 106 xsi... duno if the loom is the same tho
  16. #16
    106 xsi is about vtr spec iirc ??
  17. #17
    ye think they are about 100bhp standard... as said duno about loom
  18. #18
    i think you have to modify the loom and splice the 106 loom with the saxo one
  19. #19
    lookin on auto trader, can pick up a 1.4 saxo for about £5-600 or could swap camps and go pug......