Important! : Whats the fastest a Standard VTR can do with even the best of induction kits?

  1. Regular Poster Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 349 2000 Mk2 Saxo VTR, 1997 Mk1 Saxo.
    #1
    As title. Im amused. Sorry if its the wrong thread.

    This 'guy' said he can get 160 out of his VTR. I LOL at him everyday because I said my VTR was fast accelerating.

    He is on SaxP actually, but not gunna name and shame him.
  2. Regular Poster Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 349 2000 Mk2 Saxo VTR, 1997 Mk1 Saxo.
    #2
    And hes never actually proved this to anyone, he just likes to try and play the hardman.
  3. Established Member Joined: Jan 2010 Haywards Heath Posts: 2143 Saxo 1.1 desire
    #3
    i thought it was 180?
    i joke but he sounds like a cock
  4. Regular Poster Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 349 2000 Mk2 Saxo VTR, 1997 Mk1 Saxo.
    #4
    I hope your being sarcastic. lol.
  5. Saxperience Forum Bum Joined: Jul 2007 Chester Posts: 2850 1275 mini
    #5
    pretty sure i read that to reach over the 150 region with the actual aerodynamics constants of the saxo it would need a silly amount of hp, something like 400bhp.

    someone actually worked it out accurately on here

    basically your mate telling porkies lol
  6. Saxperience Post Whore Joined: May 2006 Kent Posts: 8205 :(s)rac
    #6
    Please name and shame.

    That's hilarious.
  7. Regular Poster Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 349 2000 Mk2 Saxo VTR, 1997 Mk1 Saxo.
    #7
    He isnt a mate. he just tries to take the piss outa me because I said my 1.1 was quiet fast at acceleration (I proved this which it was) done 0-62 in about 10 secs which isnt too bad.
  8. Saxperience Post Whore Joined: Sep 2007 Someones Bumhole Posts: 5721 Mk2 16v Desire
    #8
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by tisandy View Post
    He isnt a mate. he just tries to take the piss outa me because I said my 1.1 was quiet fast at acceleration (I proved this which it was) done 0-62 in about 10 secs which isnt too bad.
    10 seconds is an absolutely shit 0-60 time. And also I'd love to know how you got that as the book speed and quickest I've seen is around 12 seconds.
  9. Regular Poster Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 349 2000 Mk2 Saxo VTR, 1997 Mk1 Saxo.
    #9
    10 seconds is not too bad for a 1.1 mark 1 with piper cross induction kit and straight through exhaust.
  10. L-plater Joined: May 2011 Posts: 51
    #10
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by tisandy View Post
    10 seconds is not too bad for a 1.1 mark 1 with piper cross induction kit and straight through exhaust.
    did you time that yourself
  11. Regular Poster Joined: Feb 2011 Stafford Posts: 467 Mk1 VTR - VTS conversion
    #11
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by evovtr View Post
    did you time that yourself
    lol at the newbie

    Put a VTS in your VTR like I did... you will see abit of a difference
  12. Saxperience Forum Bum Joined: Oct 2010 Bournemouth/Edmonton/Chelmsford Posts: 2650 Audi A3
    #12
    just lol
  13. Regular Poster Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 349 2000 Mk2 Saxo VTR, 1997 Mk1 Saxo.
    #13
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Jam3s View Post
    lol at the newbie

    Put a VTS in your VTR like I did... you will see abit of a difference
    How much did that cost?
  14. L-plater Joined: May 2011 Posts: 51
    #14
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Jam3s View Post
    lol at the newbie

    Put a VTS in your VTR like I did... you will see abit of a difference
    why would i want to do that will it make it go faster.ill stick to my evo for power as its around 350 bhp and 0 60 in 4.2 sec my vtr is a work car that i use to take me to work so im not after a 10 second car
  15. Saxperience Post Whore Joined: Sep 2007 Someones Bumhole Posts: 5721 Mk2 16v Desire
    #15
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by tisandy View Post
    10 seconds is not too bad for a 1.1 mark 1 with piper cross induction kit and straight through exhaust.
    There's no way that's possible mate sorry. And a 'fast acceleration' IMO is sub 5 seconds
  16. Established Member Joined: Jun 2007 Belfast Posts: 1001 red 1.0 wonder
    #16
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Jam3s View Post
    lol at the newbie

    Put a VTS in your VTR like I did... you will see abit of a difference
    sure the VTR has more torque...8 valves remember
  17. Saxperience Post Whore Joined: May 2009 Birmingham Posts: 5801 1.1 106 XN Time, MK2 VTR 01. Ford Focus ST3 CP320
    #17
    So first we have a VTR that does 160mph.... then a 1.1 that will do 0 - 60mph in 10 seconds..... Ive just come back from the pub but i only had two beers ?
  18. Saxperience Hardcore! Joined: Dec 2007 smurfland. Posts: 17346 Ex saxo owner.
    #18
    O`h god don`t say its Railroader lol.


    Steve.
  19. Established Member Joined: Oct 2010 Southampton/Reading Posts: 1186 Cars Are For Gays.
    #19
    vtr/vts it doesnt matter there only really nippy cars.
    a FAST car is something which can hit 60 sub 4/5 seconds and will hit 150mph without too much of a sweat.
  20. Saxperience Forum Bum Joined: Oct 2009 Colchester/Coventry Posts: 2809 92 Mx5
    #20
    Whats the fastest a Standard VTR can do with even the best of induction kits?
    ............................Standard.............................................Induction kit
    Paradox...
  21. Infrequent Poster Joined: Feb 2009 South Wales Posts: 101
    #21
    L O L im not on any sides here but there is now way in hell that you had 0 - 60 in 10 seconds out of a 1.1 engine i had a 1.5vtec civic which on paper did 0 - 60 in 10.2, you must of been counting really slowly when you done it haha no offence
  22. Established Member Joined: Aug 2009 Colchester/Harwich, Essex Posts: 2208 EG Civic Turbo & CRX Del Sol VTi
    #22
    Name and shame.

    Because I want to go to his house and kick him in the face for being so fucking stupid.
  23. Frequent Poster Joined: Dec 2009 England Posts: 574 1998 saxo 1.1 sx 2001 saxo vtr
    #23
    did you count with ur hands and start from 1?
  24. Infrequent Poster Joined: Feb 2009 South Wales Posts: 101
    #24
    haha a bit harsh, but funny lmao
  25. Saxperience Post Whore Joined: Dec 2006 Maidstone Posts: 8210 Golf TDI
    #25
    The only way a VTR would do 160mph is if you dropped it out of a plane at 35k feet

    An induction kit will give you maybe 5bhp (being optimistic)
  26. Infrequent Poster Joined: Feb 2009 South Wales Posts: 101
    #26
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by devilsadvocate View Post
    The only way a VTR would do 160mph is if you dropped it out of a plane at 35k feet

    An induction kit will give you maybe 5bhp (being optimistic)
    Haha sooo funny

    or maybe down a never ending hill like this:

    \
    \
    \
    \
    \
  27. Regular Poster Joined: Nov 2010 Posts: 349 2000 Mk2 Saxo VTR, 1997 Mk1 Saxo.
    #27
    His names Scott Radford. not sure on his SaxP name lol
  28. Infrequent Poster Joined: Feb 2009 South Wales Posts: 101
    #28
    Haha named and shamed
  29. Saxperience Post Whore Joined: Dec 2010 Chesterfield/Nottingham Posts: 7147 dead vts. twisted 106 gti. '03' vtrrrr
    #29
    if a vtr can do 160, i best trade in my vts for 1
  30. Established Member Joined: May 2010 leicester Posts: 1446 Clio 182 Inferno
    #30
    lol he must have made his own dials up or hes looking at Kph
  31. Saxperience Post Whore Joined: May 2006 Kent Posts: 8205 :(s)rac
    #31
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by devilsadvocate View Post
    The only way a VTR would do 160mph is if you dropped it out of a plane at 35k feet

    An induction kit will give you maybe 5bhp (being optimistic)
    Probably wouldn't hit much over 100mph dropped from that height tbh.
  32. L-plater Joined: May 2011 Posts: 51
    #32
    maybe if it was towed by a veyron it might reach 160 if it didnt fall apart as the aerodynamics arent brilliant