Airbagged vs non Airbagged gti interior?

1. LSOfreak Saxperience Addict Joined: Jan 2008 west london Posts: 13810

   #1 18th June 2011, 01:17

   Which looks better? which is comfier?
   to remind you of what they look like...
   
   airbagged
   
   
   non -airbagged
   
2. user_44502 Saxperience Post Whore Joined: May 2010 Posts: 6234

   #2 18th June 2011, 02:07

   I'd have the non airbagged
3. user_10418 Saxperience Addict Joined: Jun 2006 Wirral Posts: 13584 Wickerd red VTS MK2, Two tone VTS MK2,vvc Metro..

   #3 18th June 2011, 02:11

   Airbagged might just save you some how.........
4. UKtom Established Member Joined: Sep 2010 Portsmouth Posts: 1936 Scirocco

   #4 18th June 2011, 07:28

   Quote:

   Originally Posted by saxokid100 Airbagged might just save you some how.........

   he does drive a saxo after all however i would also go for airbagged just for safety
5. jacko616 Infrequent Poster Joined: Nov 2010 Midhurst Posts: 119 Mk2 Icelandic Vtr '86 Mini

   #5 18th June 2011, 08:29

   Non-airbagged look like they'll hold you better, but i like the thought of the extra safety.
6. Ashleyp Saxperience Hardcore! Joined: Apr 2008 Bedford & Manchester Posts: 17504

   #6 18th June 2011, 08:44

   The non-bagged do have slightly more defined side bolsters and hold you a bit better. But bagged seats are comfier and still pretty supportive.
7. nickuk L-plater Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 37

   #7 18th June 2011, 09:47

   Mine are the non-airbagged and personally i think they're sweet.
8. LSOfreak Saxperience Addict Joined: Jan 2008 west london Posts: 13810

   #8 18th June 2011, 11:20

   well the airbags wont be plugged in so safety is out of the question lol
   my old seats were non airbagged, just unsure whether to go for airbagged? they look newer, but not sure if they look better than the older style or hold you in better
9. user_39461 Super Moderator Joined: Nov 2009 Cambridge(ish), UK. Posts: 10581 BMW 5x M50d.

   #9 18th June 2011, 11:23

   Non-airbagged are FAR more comfy. I've had both, including brand new airbagged ones.
   
   The non-airbagged ones allow you to sit a little "deeper" in the seat, so hold you a little better. If they were both in the same condition, I'd have the non-airbagged every time - especially as you can't use the airbags in airbagged ones anyway...
10. user_44502 Saxperience Post Whore Joined: May 2010 Posts: 6234

    #10 18th June 2011, 11:30

    If there not going to be plugged in defo the Non airbagged ones
11. user_39156 Infrequent Poster Joined: Nov 2009 Weston super Mare Posts: 189

    #11 18th June 2011, 11:39

    had non air bagged ones in my car and have sold them for something that will hold you in more. if you are slim you tend to slide about a bit.
12. LSOfreak Saxperience Addict Joined: Jan 2008 west london Posts: 13810

    #12 18th June 2011, 12:11

    thanks guys, i think i may stick with non airbagged again then

    1 user thanked this post: user_44502
13. user_41948 Frequent Poster Joined: Feb 2010 Wivenhoe, Essex Posts: 968 White MK2 VTR (Dead black/pink VTR)

    #13 19th June 2011, 17:10

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Ashleyp The non-bagged do have slightly more defined side bolsters and hold you a bit better..

    +1
    
    Mine are the non airbagged, and theyre so comfy! The bolsters keep you nice and snug
14. user_45322 Regular Poster Joined: Jun 2010 West Yorkshire Posts: 396 Saxo VTR. 1.4 Cinquecento.

    #14 19th June 2011, 23:25

    I tried both and non airbagged are more supportive and more comfortable.
    I wouldnt swap mine for any other seats.
15. Claki Established Member Joined: Aug 2009 Horsham Posts: 1855 Leon Cupra 200 TDI

    #15 19th June 2011, 23:31

    Airbagged Look sooooo Good! But Comfort goes to the Non bagg'd