parkers.co.uk... correct!? :S

1. spinny_vinnie L-plater Joined: May 2007 Gloucestershire Posts: 49 Berlingo Van (lol)

   #1 9th August 2007, 18:55

   just looked on parkers.co.uk and the saxo vts is apparently almost a whole second quicker than the 106 gti? is that true? also its a group 14 insurance and the 106 is 13. i thought they were the same engine
2. saunders Saxperience Forum Bum Joined: May 2006 Kent Posts: 3669 Fiat Seicento, MK2 Furio 2000 X, Pug 206

   #2 9th August 2007, 18:57

   Quote:

   Originally Posted by spinny_vinnie just looked on parkers.co.uk and the saxo vts is apparently almost a whole second quicker than the 106 gti? is that true? also its a group 14 insurance and the 106 is 13. i thought they were the same engine

   
   NO NO NO, its been covered loads of times, there both the same
3. spinny_vinnie L-plater Joined: May 2007 Gloucestershire Posts: 49 Berlingo Van (lol)

   #3 9th August 2007, 18:58

   oh sorry. my bad.
4. VTR-Chris-VTR Established Member Joined: Jun 2007 Bristol - St George Posts: 2364 Mk2 Saxo VTS

   #4 10th August 2007, 00:57

   its also weird how the 106 GTi is slower to 60mph then the VTS?
5. Predator_R32p Super Moderator Joined: Mar 2003 Durham (England) Posts: 37932 1. AX 2. Mk2 Saxo VTR 3. MK4 R32 DBP

   #5 10th August 2007, 01:00

   parkers is bollocks on there specs
6. Mieran Saxperience Post Whore Joined: Jul 2007 Newcastle Posts: 6719

   #6 10th August 2007, 01:01

   Apparently when Peugeot tested the 106 they had a full tank of petrol and a passenger to make the car a bit more slower so it can be classified in a lower insurance group
7. dannygti Saxperience Post Whore Joined: Feb 2006 dudley United Kingdom (England) Posts: 6790 106 gti/ SEAT LCR

   #7 10th August 2007, 01:02

   they are exactly the same matey,apparently the gti was tsted with two passengers and hald a tank of fuel.
   
   bet me to it Mieran