Quote:
Originally Posted by AL3X_
Found this link which says to make the ECU fuel correctly with a decat mani you should blank the first lambda hole and put the first lambda in the second hole, then sleeve the second lambda...
http://c2club.co.uk/showthread.php?6...-lambda-sensor
Is this true as my first lambda is in the first hole, with the second hole blanked off and a sleeve fitted to the second lambda
|
I can understand if you removed the cat on a vtr or a jp4 type engine with cat close to manifold ,but keeping the std cast manifold
that it wold run better ,as the probe is in a large chamber and removing the cat would drop prseeure in top of manifold ,so the probe would get pulses of gas .
same goes for a probe fitted to only one half of a 4-2-1 manifold (seeing only 2 cylinders).
I would guess that having further down the manifold the probe gets a more stable flow of gas and so gives a better average of total gas content .
but it must always be the green probe on a 2 porbe car not the blue one .
it could be it makes the car run slightly richer ,but if that produces more power ,then it could mean better use of the fuel and therefore you end up with better mpg .
any cat will sap power and economy ,so combine the loss of cat with more stable sensor output and thats you the reason .
best economy can be got at much leaner fuelling than that would give lambda 1 emissions ,but that produse other polutants ,thats why lambda1 is the std spec --emissions ,not economy
I had a customer who was very economy biased and did lots of motorway mileage ,so we set his car to run at 16.5-1 ,which on his mondeo gave him +20% economy whilst at 75mph on the motorway ,but it did make it a little suttery on pickup ,mainly due to the type of confusing device we used --simple add on unit ,not a stand alone ecu ,which could have coped better ,but of course cost alot more