super saxo

11th July 2006, 19:09

right i have been thinking 2 myself a lot recently (mainly cuz im bored at work an no1 2 tlk 2 lol)... right people have put pug 405 mi16 lumps into pug 106's in the past correct? so im thinking if its possible (due 2 pug gti lump same as vts lump) to fit it into a saxo? anyone?

11th July 2006, 19:10

If it fits into a 106 im 99% sure it would fit in a saxo!

11th July 2006, 19:29

this is very good news..... as my m8 has a spare 1 lying around tuned 2 bout 170 bhp i belive an hes a very good mate so il get a awesome price

furio mi16 sounds nice

any1 else got any ideas?

11th July 2006, 21:32

cant have been 'tuned' that much seeing as they have 160 as standard. same story as the 306 engines, imo no point as the extra weight, cost of custom bits plus shoddy handling would negate any performance gains. mildy tuned vts would be just as fast.

11th July 2006, 22:23

naa way extra weight my arse... u ever been in a pug 205 with a mi16 on a 1.6 gear box? the acceleration rapes a vts its held its own against a few decent motors

11th July 2006, 23:58

he mains the extra weight ruins the handling as it would be front heavy, great on acceleration just not the best at corners, look at 2 litre corsa's and novas.

12th July 2006, 12:10

Quote:

Originally Posted by Furio-Hoe

naa way extra weight my arse... u ever been in a pug 205 with a mi16 on a 1.6 gear box? the acceleration rapes a vts its held its own against a few decent motors

driven two, not saying they aren't quick but they handle like shite. same with the valved novas/corsas. the money is better spent else where and i'd rather not hack fuck out of engine bay thanks.

12th July 2006, 15:31

i still think its well worth it!

12th July 2006, 15:38

Quote:

Originally Posted by seanvtr81

driven two, not saying they aren't quick but they handle like shite. same with the valved novas/corsas. the money is better spent else where and i'd rather not hack fuck out of engine bay thanks.

You are a jockey... i have a 205 with a wide arch dimma kit which theoretically should even furtherly decrease the handling due to the not so aero dynamic arches... but the handling of mine is good... soo good i can take a roundabout going straight over at 70mph.. it only just understeers a fraction.. and im on pretty much stock suspension with uprated dampers.. its rigid as fuck and holds the road fine.. and i have raped every single saxo that has ever raced me.. not that many take on the challenege because its quite obvious theres no point in racing me in a 1.6 no matter whats been done to it. If you say you have driven two... and the handling is crap i suggest you re think your thread and edit it so that people understand what you are saying... you blow at driving...

12th July 2006, 19:58

Mate do what YOU wanna do, everyone on here is honest and will give you their own personal opinion, obviously not everyone is gonna agree with each other but i think if ya wanna be different then go for it, here this is an old thread of mine but take 5-10mins to read it and u will find all the info your after.... http://www.saxperience.com/forum/showthread.php?t=38247

12th July 2006, 22:37

Quote:

Originally Posted by 205turbo

You are a jockey... i have a 205 with a wide arch dimma kit which theoretically should even furtherly decrease the handling due to the not so aero dynamic arches... but the handling of mine is good... soo good i can take a roundabout going straight over at 70mph.. it only just understeers a fraction.. and im on pretty much stock suspension with uprated dampers.. its rigid as fuck and holds the road fine.. and i have raped every single saxo that has ever raced me.. not that many take on the challenege because its quite obvious theres no point in racing me in a 1.6 no matter whats been done to it. If you say you have driven two... and the handling is crap i suggest you re think your thread and edit it so that people understand what you are saying... you blow at driving...

you're my hero. can i have your babies?

12th July 2006, 23:50

205Turbo why are you even on this site?

Sean knows his shit

If its got a wide arch, then im guessin wheels will have spacers on, therefore the car is wider, would that not help for better handling?

And you do realise your ment to go around the round about, not straight over?

13th July 2006, 06:52

Quote:

Originally Posted by yate5y

205Turbo why are you even on this site?

Sean knows his shit

If its got a wide arch, then im guessin wheels will have spacers on, therefore the car is wider, would that not help for better handling?

And you do realise your ment to go around the round about, not straight over?

: :clap: ha ha ha ha

yate5y how right you are, wide arch kit = spacers, tomake it look good = wheels set wider apart = MUCH better handling. :Y:

13th July 2006, 11:32

post some pics of the 205.....

13th July 2006, 11:40

Quote:

Originally Posted by 205turbo

You are a jockey... i have a 205 with a wide arch dimma kit which theoretically should even furtherly decrease the handling due to the not so aero dynamic arches... but the handling of mine is good... soo good i can take a roundabout going straight over at 70mph.. it only just understeers a fraction.. and im on pretty much stock suspension with uprated dampers.. its rigid as fuck and holds the road fine.. and i have raped every single saxo that has ever raced me.. not that many take on the challenege because its quite obvious theres no point in racing me in a 1.6 no matter whats been done to it. If you say you have driven two... and the handling is crap i suggest you re think your thread and edit it so that people understand what you are saying... you blow at driving...

Yawn from you again mate, same as your last thread has this 205 not got something like 300bhp? No 1.6 can beat you, not even a 297bhp vts? Thats lighter than you (ax shell) and has same power? Physics tells me your wrong

Standard suspension lol, theres some roundabouts that can be taken at 100+ mph but thats because they are big round abouts.

Built the supra yet?

13th July 2006, 18:04

gti and vts are the same engine just diffrent rocker cover and maybe a coulpe of odd bits thats it

13th July 2006, 18:09

So why are gti's faster than vts's??

13th July 2006, 18:34

they arent? same car same engine, if anything the gti is slightly heavier

13th July 2006, 18:43

cant remember who it was but a company done tests on both the cars and the gti came out 5bhp more than vts? are there any different models?

13th July 2006, 18:48

Quote:

Originally Posted by Billog_VTR

cant remember who it was but a company done tests on both the cars and the gti came out 5bhp more than vts? are there any different models?

nope. both left the factory with 120bhp.

13th July 2006, 22:07

2 reply on supra... the engine is due 2 arrive next week hopefully... the turbo kit an intercooler etc etc etc is already sittin waiting.

eitherway once his mi16 drops outta his 205 i wanna purchase it n try n fix it in cuz i think it ul b tha bollocks

if my handlin was that bad with the mi in it i wud splash out on new suspension

eres a couple of pics i cud find of his 205 all i got sorry

13th July 2006, 22:17

hold on though, first you say your mate has a spare 170bhp engine, then you say you'll have his engine when it drops out of his 205. but didn't he say his engine had 300bhp? sniff sniff....

14th July 2006, 01:20

nice 16 valve badge too :Y:

14th July 2006, 14:43

hes puttin into a new 1 n thats the shell

14th July 2006, 15:41

Quote:

Originally Posted by 205turbo

You are a jockey... i have a 205 with a wide arch dimma kit which theoretically should even furtherly decrease the handling due to the not so aero dynamic arches... but the handling of mine is good... soo good i can take a roundabout going straight over at 70mph.. it only just understeers a fraction.. and im on pretty much stock suspension with uprated dampers.. its rigid as fuck and holds the road fine.. and i have raped every single saxo that has ever raced me.. not that many take on the challenege because its quite obvious theres no point in racing me in a 1.6 no matter whats been done to it. If you say you have driven two... and the handling is crap i suggest you re think your thread and edit it so that people understand what you are saying... you blow at driving...

well what a jockey you are! it's because of people like you that there's accidents and that insurance goes up for younger more sensible drivers. Also the reason most people havent tried to race you is because its dangerous you knob cheese! Coming on here and insulting members who have been on this site for so long I ought to kick your lily ass!!!

14th July 2006, 22:21

LMBO!!!! I love threads like this, people claiming there cars are much quicker than they are etc etc, pictures of the engine bay would be good too.

15th July 2006, 12:08

not my car... lol