Hiya I have booked a mobile remap for my 1.6 8 valve vtr... Its 200 quid for the mobile remap where they come out to me! Is it worth the money and is it jus as good as being done on a rolling road? Also I am getting the limiter removed will this do damage becasue the engineer said it won't do any damage but I don't no what to think? Anyone??
remap on vtr
-
#1
-
#2has it had any mods done to it that need mapped like a cam? other people may disagree but i dont think a remap alone will make big difference for the money, i may be wrong! im paying 300 for my map on a rolling road and timing done on my cams, as for the rev limiter not to sure, but someone on here will have an answer for youQuote:Hiya I have booked a mobile remap for my 1.6 8 valve vtr... Its 200 quid for the mobile remap where they come out to me! Is it worth the money and is it jus as good as being done on a rolling road? Also I am getting the limiter removed will this do damage becasue the engineer said it won't do any damage but I don't no what to think? Anyone??
-
#3I have an uprated cam 4-2-1 manifold, decat straight through exhaust, uprated fuel pressure regulator, air filter, stripped out, remap should I hope make a difference, I would put a vts in I but I'm pushing cammed vts/gti's :s wat else could I do to the little 8 valve engine?
-
#4When your saying your pushing Vts/Gti's cammed you mean that your sitting on there bumper when having fun?
-
#5a mobile remap will be a waste of money. it wont be specific to your engine, just a generic map loaded up. you'd be much better off getting it mapped on a rolling road
-
#6usually a map is needed after a cam is fitted, must be some vtr to keep up with a cammed s/gtiQuote:I have an uprated cam 4-2-1 manifold, decat straight through exhaust, uprated fuel pressure regulator, air filter, stripped out, remap should I hope make a difference, I would put a vts in I but I'm pushing cammed vts/gti's :s wat else could I do to the little 8 valve engine?
-
#7no word of a lie im sat next to them laughing at them. they take me after 100 coz my vtr slows down after 110 ish . u reakon it would be a waste of money tho? its jus easier than going somewhere due to me working everyday apart from sundays lool
-
#8Honestly i'am sat laughing at you.7 users thanked this post: , , , , , ,
-
#9cheers guys.
-
#10does the uprated regulator make much of a difference?? if so where and what is this off?
-
#11go somewhere to get it done and you might get some gains but mobile map wont take your mods into consideration so might not do anything. if u want more power then force induction or noz. looking between £1000-house deposit type of money depending on what u do really skys the limit with saxo's as they have been out for so long there is everything mod wise for them.
-
#12Pointless unless its custom to your car.
The fact you reckon your chasing down cammed Vts/Gti's is bollox. Even a 16v with breather mods would leave your vtr.
How much power do you reckon you have and will have?
Bare in mind my 8v cammed and bodies with headworked Rallye made 156bhp@7300rpm. -
#13I'd definately take it to a Dyno to have it mapped, generic computer maps just aren't accurate enough. And I wouldn't remove the rev limiter, you would be much safer raising it to about 7k instead
-
#14If you want to waste £200 then send me a cheque.Quote:Hiya I have booked a mobile remap for my 1.6 8 valve vtr... Its 200 quid for the mobile remap where they come out to me! Is it worth the money and is it jus as good as being done on a rolling road? Also I am getting the limiter removed will this do damage becasue the engineer said it won't do any damage but I don't no what to think? Anyone??1 user thanked this post:
-
#15To be fair i had my Mk2 Vtr remapped, the only mods it has are a full 4-2-1 manifold and cda induction, i decided not to bother with fitting cams in the end. After having it remapped it felt more drivable and any niggling flat spots seemed to have gone. Went Santapod today and ran a 16.1 quarter mile which is pretty good for 8v id say. I wonder what it would run with some newmans ph3's fitted
-
#16I to am sitting here laughing at you
-
#19Give Chipwizards a phone. Better than getting a mobile remap but at a price.
-
#20Can i remap my new tyres?
Hoping for good grip lines, guys!
Cheers.3 users thanked this post: , , -
#21I ran 14.6 on concrete. Which is roughly a second slower than Santa Pod.Quote:To be fair i had my Mk2 Vtr remapped, the only mods it has are a full 4-2-1 manifold and cda induction, i decided not to bother with fitting cams in the end. After having it remapped it felt more drivable and any niggling flat spots seemed to have gone. Went Santapod today and ran a 16.1 quarter mile which is pretty good for 8v id say. I wonder what it would run with some newmans ph3's fitted

-
#22You keep up with cammed gti? What a load of bollocks. Give jeffchiz a race or tom5190 if you think you can keep with cammed 16vs. Dick.
-
#23To be fair.. When I had my 8v engine in, I had a race upto a ton with my mate who had 106 GTI / pt51 cams / full system remapped and built by PUG1OFF.
And he pulled 2-3 car length's 0-100mph.. He was as surprised as I was.. But he had full interior...
Mine was gutted..
Last time I mentioned this, All I got was 'must of been fucked' 'he wasn't trying' etc.
When it wasn't fucked - and he definitely WAS trying.
Now I've got a 16V in my car.. Yes it's abit faster - but not a whole world faster - If You put them at the side of each other, your talking a few second's difference - Which doesn't look that much.
But if trying to knock second's off a 1/4 mile time - it would take quite abit..
people here claiming they got 16 sec's etc in a 8v.. a half decent time for a 16v is 14-15.. So your talking 1-2 sec's difference over 1/4 mile / upto 80-90..
It's not a world of difference is it?
So I can easily see how people say they can keep with 16vs etc.
But if they was to mod their 8v to overtake a 16v.. It would take alot more than they think. (no boost.) -
#24You sure it was built by us with kent cams ?Quote:To be fair.. When I had my 8v engine in, I had a race upto a ton with my mate who had 106 GTI / pt51 cams / full system remapped and built by PUG1OFF.
And he pulled 2-3 car length's 0-100mph.. He was as surprised as I was.. But he had full interior...
Mine was gutted..
Last time I mentioned this, All I got was 'must of been fucked' 'he wasn't trying' etc.
When it wasn't fucked - and he definitely WAS trying.
Now I've got a 16V in my car.. Yes it's abit faster - but not a whole world faster - If You put them at the side of each other, your talking a few second's difference - Which doesn't look that much.
But if trying to knock second's off a 1/4 mile time - it would take quite abit..
people here claiming they got 16 sec's etc in a 8v.. a half decent time for a 16v is 14-15.. So your talking 1-2 sec's difference over 1/4 mile / upto 80-90..
It's not a world of difference is it?
So I can easily see how people say they can keep with 16vs etc.
But if they was to mod their 8v to overtake a 16v.. It would take alot more than they think. (no boost.)
2 seconds over 1/4 mile is alot. you can see 14 seconds with a lightweight saxo/106 with around 165-170hp.
a 206hp lightweight 106 we built gets 13's, thats only a second quicker.
I think 2 seconds difference on a 1/4 mile is a huge amount i was 2 seconds quicker than a corsa and it was a long way behind. -
#252 seconds over a 14 second quarter is approximately 15%. id call that a pretty significant amount
-
#26You can get about 135bhp from an 8v if you know how!
-
#27Deffo need a remap then.Quote:I have an uprated cam 4-2-1 manifold, decat straight through exhaust, uprated fuel pressure regulator, air filter, stripped out, remap should I hope make a difference, I would put a vts in I but I'm pushing cammed vts/gti's :s wat else could I do to the little 8 valve engine?1 user thanked this post:
-
#29Yeah. 1600cc Mk2 bottom, mk1 head, vts injectors, omex 600 ecu, panel filter exhaust system, sees around 133bhp. That's stock hatch spec. Not bad for 8v1 user thanked this post:
-
#31Yeah standard cam, Kent pulley.
-
#33Im quite surprised at that figure though consider the stock hatch regulations and so on, wouldnt have thought they'd run that kind of power
-
#34Yeah they run just over 111bhp at the wheels.
-
#35This is the stuff stock hatch teams dont let out and pass info around on lol. Hollow out the cat too so it looks like it has a cat for regs but flows freely. Its the blacktop head they use with the mk2 bottom end.
-
#36Why do they use the mk2 bottom end? Surely the 1.6 xsi one would be a better choice with its domed pistons to make a bit more compression. Saying that though the rallye s2 has slightly dished ones which I find strange
-
#39Just told you how lol. Read up
-
#40Well it's all on madmattracing 's stock hatch progress blog as well mateQuote:This is the stuff stock hatch teams dont let out and pass info around on lol. Hollow out the cat too so it looks like it has a cat for regs but flows freely. Its the blacktop head they use with the mk2 bottom end.
yeah most use black top head on the 98bhp bottom end. Some don't.
No lol -
#43Stock hatch rules state no removal of head material in the ports . you can skim the head and have 3 angle seat valves but thats all
manic -
#44You say this but when I had my GTI all it had was a full stainless steel with decat and it would sit on the ass of RX8's and Astra GSI's till around 90, I think sometimes you get those engines that are for some reason quick in comparison to others
-
#45Well aren't you proving him right by saying how quick they are?Quote:You say this but when I had my GTI all it had was a full stainless steel with decat and it would sit on the ass of RX8's and Astra GSI's till around 90, I think sometimes you get those engines that are for some reason quick in comparison to others
I had a little play with a wrx sti the other day when he was in front he couldnt pull away when i was in front he couldn't get in front of me that's probably the first car in 5 years if driving that I've played with that's worth mentioning
He must have felt gutted showing off the to girl in his passenger seat that I was on his tail in my saxo the first time he booted it off and every other time after that lol as I went past him I looked over and he just nodded at me, first time in a while I thought I'm not sick of my car -
#46Sam mate, I really dont think it was a WRX STI or he wasnt giving it his all.Quote:Well aren't you proving him right by saying how quick they are?
I had a little play with a wrx sti the other day when he was in front he couldnt pull away when i was in front he couldn't get in front of me that's probably the first car in 5 years if driving that I've played with that's worth mentioning
He must have felt gutted showing off the to girl in his passenger seat that I was on his tail in my saxo the first time he booted it off and every other time after that lol as I went past him I looked over and he just nodded at me, first time in a while I thought I'm not sick of my car
A WRX STI has a 0-100 time of 12.9
A Standard VTS has a 0-100 time of 22.4
0-100 is the better stat to go by than a 0-60 as majority of people know.
Even though you have throttle bodies, it only mapped out at 155bhp max right? And even though midrange will have improved I dont think it would challenge a WRX STI. How much does your car weigh?
Toads light weight 106 was 785Kgs and 185bhp and that did a 0-60 in 5.2seconds which is only just on par with the wrx sti and that was with a huge spec!
Quote:Engine / Transmission:
1.4 XSi gearbox
Quaife ATB differential
Fully re-built TU5JP4 lump
Low friction big ends
Re-bored to 80mm
80mm Wossner Hi-Comp pistons (running 12.3:1 cr)
Forged conrods and ARP rod bolts
Modified head to accept bigger valves
Newman uprated valve springs
Newman 280 degree PH4 camshafts
AT Power iTBs with 90mm trumpets
Emerald management - 185bhp @ 7650rpm - 140lb/ft @ 6600rpm
306 GTi6 injectors
Peugeot Sport GrpA engine mounts
Helix Lightweight aluminum flywheel - 2.9kgs
Lightweight aluminum crank pulley
Mocal 13 row oil cooler
Lightweight fan
Autoglym catch tank - high performance
Puegeot Sport 2" exhaust system
Supersprint 421 manifold -
#47Believe me if you saw the way he was driving he was going for it undertaking cars around round abouts when i was in front of him trying to drive sensibley he came flying up my rear with the dump valve singing with both went for it after a round about i pulled in to the slow lane to give him chance to pass he couldnt get past if anything it was him trying to get me to race, they have a power to weight ratio of 177bhp/tonne mine is 176bhp/tonne there is 1bhp per/tonne in it, i wouldnt have believed it myself, from what ive seen there is a non turbo and a 2 turbo versions; 215bhp and 261 bhp, the non turbo is vtr power so i would have dicked all over it so that rules that model not to mention you could hear the dump vavle from a mile away, it had to one of the others, even if it was a 215bhp model considering it has 4 wheel drive and just the fact its an imprezza i was impressed with how my saxo performed against it, but the facts are he WAS going for it, it Was a turbo model and it looked like an sti with the large boot spoiler as the wrx's have the little one, the badge on the back said sti lol when i pulled up by the side of him he just nodded at me as if to say well done lolQuote:Sam mate, I really dont think it was a WRX STI or he wasnt giving it his all.
A WRX STI has a 0-100 time of 12.9
A Standard VTS has a 0-100 time of 22.4
0-100 is the better stat to go by than a 0-60 as majority of people know.
Even though you have throttle bodies, it only mapped out at 155bhp max right? And even though midrange will have improved I dont think it would challenge a WRX STI. How much does your car weigh?
Toads light weight 106 was 785Kgs and 185bhp and that did a 0-60 in 5.2seconds which is only just on par with the wrx sti and that was with a huge spec!
i suppose you could say it was down to him not being a good driver or not giving its full (but you can tell when some one is going for it, and the way he was driving he was going for it) but we were on a duel carridge way in a straight line there isnt much skill envovled in it, saying that i got around the round abouts quicker than him
oh it wieghs 880kgs and imprezza is 1475kg
also you got to remember we were already driving we weren't going from a standing start (which correct me if im wrong this is where the imprezza would have benefitted), so considering our power to weight is pretty much exactly the same, we were already travelling along at about 40/50mph and it was a dry day so even my car with shit tyres wouldnt have any problem accelerating, i wouldnt have thought there would be much in it
either way we'll leave it at that dont get me wrong i to am abit dubious about it all, im just saying what i saw lol -
#48Got to admit I sat next to a bug eye wrx and an astray VXR on way to Atspeed one day. 50 to double. Shocked the feck out of me let alone the other drivers. Scoobies gf was a munter!
