Saxo vtr power run

1. henryvtr Infrequent Poster Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 175

   #1 4th February 2013, 14:20

   Thought I would post up about vtr, I no they get alot of stick for not being a vts but hey they are two diffrent cars, I'm running all mods spec as follows
   Supersprint mani
   Saxsport pipe
   Bmc type induction
   Piper ultimate fast road cam(roller rocker)
   Lightweight pulleys including cam pully
   Lightweight flywheel (3.4kg)
   Ported and knife edged throttle body
   4 bar fuel reg
   Ngk iridium plugs
   10w40 castrol magnatec
   Running v power
   Oil breather/swirl pot
   Piper valve springs
   
   Had it remapped on the rolling road and it made
   130 ft lb and 118hp (fly figures)
   There wasn't a massive improvement in peak figures only a couple of horse power but it improved the mid range by a few hp and keept the torque higher for longer, on the road it feels much better through the gear changes and I was also able to have the rev limit lifted up to 7k, not that will be using that high, engine was still making 100 hp at 6700 rpm which wasn't to bad, only cost me 150 quid and it was worth that just to get the afr spot on, hope all the VTRs should now no wat to be expecting once tuned, I dnt Wana here you should of just got a vts because I dnt want 16v, my vtr and two of my freinds pug gtis are all even to 80ish yes they dnt have cams but do have all breathing mods and pipes, I only run out of puff due to the 1.1 gearbox lol, thanks and will post graph later if I can
2. Tom5190 Saxperience Post Whore Joined: Sep 2007 Someones Bumhole Posts: 5721 Mk2 16v Desire

   #2 4th February 2013, 14:25

   130 lb/ft!? What road was that done on?
3. henryvtr Infrequent Poster Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 175

   #3 4th February 2013, 14:32

   A rolling one, lol, to give a reference to the rollers my ford focus on fri made 285hp and 370lb which was down on what quoted by superchips, should of seen 300hp, and prob would on a more number friendly dyno, like superchips one lol
4. Tom5190 Saxperience Post Whore Joined: Sep 2007 Someones Bumhole Posts: 5721 Mk2 16v Desire

   #4 4th February 2013, 14:36

   I know a rolling one lol i mean what type?
5. henryvtr Infrequent Poster Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 175

   #5 4th February 2013, 18:13

   Dyno mite , I think was the make, the operater is very good at what he does to, was interesting
6. user_34323 Saxperience Post Whore Joined: May 2009 ringwood Posts: 6305 suzuki swift 1.2 sz3

   #6 4th February 2013, 18:19

   So you N/A petrol car produced more torque than HP at the fly? For real? I call bullshit.
7. Gandi699 Saxperience Post Whore Joined: Apr 2011 Posts: 9100 Amazon green VTR 16v, Inferno RS clio 182

   #7 4th February 2013, 18:49

   With just a mild cam too and the usual breathing mods?
   Sounds like quote me happy results in my view
8. henryvtr Infrequent Poster Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 175

   #8 4th February 2013, 19:15

   The engines a gooden, only 70k and rebuilt the head when I installed the cam, did get a little work with the dremal but only cleaning sloppy cast really, gearbox is brand new 1.1 item, drive shafts are brand new it got pro race 1.2 alloys, it is in its peak form at moment mybe lol
9. Tom5190 Saxperience Post Whore Joined: Sep 2007 Someones Bumhole Posts: 5721 Mk2 16v Desire

   #9 4th February 2013, 19:20

   I can imagine that the improvements from what youve done are very noticeable but 130lb/ft is way to high. You got the graph?
10. user_43898 Established Member Joined: May 2010 leicester Posts: 1446 Clio 182 Inferno

    #10 4th February 2013, 19:28

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Tom5190 I can imagine that the improvements from what youve done are very noticeable but 130lb/ft is way to high. You got the graph?

    maybe he means NM mine roaded at 105bhp and 135NM
11. burgin2011 Frequent Poster Joined: Sep 2011 alfreton Posts: 533 saxoo vtr mk1, 104bhp

    #11 4th February 2013, 19:38

    130lbft is in a dream land with them mods! 130nm seems more like it
12. henryvtr Infrequent Poster Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 175

    #12 4th February 2013, 19:38

    Na it in ft lb, I realy don't no how to put the graph up otherwise I would
13. burgin2011 Frequent Poster Joined: Sep 2011 alfreton Posts: 533 saxoo vtr mk1, 104bhp

    #13 4th February 2013, 19:55

    with 118bhp :-\ would keep quite when i see the proof , sign in to photobucket upload photo when done copy ig something code on right hand side then past on here
14. Tom5190 Saxperience Post Whore Joined: Sep 2007 Someones Bumhole Posts: 5721 Mk2 16v Desire

    #14 4th February 2013, 19:58

    What were the wheel figures?
15. AlexBp West Midlands Joined: Dec 2007 West mids Posts: 23149 Supra,civic GL

    #15 4th February 2013, 20:00

    So your aparently making more torque than most cammed 16v with an 8v
    
    
    Yea good luck with that
    N/a cars dont makes more torque than power.....
16. henryvtr Infrequent Poster Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 175

    #16 4th February 2013, 20:32

    
17. henryvtr Infrequent Poster Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 175

    #17 4th February 2013, 20:34

    Graph of before and after remap, no spectacular gains but also lifted rev limit to 7k rpm
18. Tom5190 Saxperience Post Whore Joined: Sep 2007 Someones Bumhole Posts: 5721 Mk2 16v Desire

    #18 4th February 2013, 20:40

    I think that rolling road needs calibrating!
19. AlexBp West Midlands Joined: Dec 2007 West mids Posts: 23149 Supra,civic GL

    #19 4th February 2013, 20:48

    Can i ask why with power dropping off like that raise the limiter??
    
    That torque figure is very unusual......
20. henryvtr Infrequent Poster Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 175

    #20 4th February 2013, 21:05

    He Was gonna lower it back down to 6500, but in the end left it didn't see a problem
21. AlexBp West Midlands Joined: Dec 2007 West mids Posts: 23149 Supra,civic GL

    #21 4th February 2013, 21:13

    Just seems rather pointless
    I suppose you could over rev rather than shift in tight corners but unless its a full track car again thats pointless