Quote:
Originally Posted by e8_pqck
No point in f1 rods for a home build project, you need a balance between cost and effectiveness. You do know there are only a handful of people that make rods? Budget ones made along side crower etc. They're all the same rod 9/10.
|
They are supposed to be a high spec item for a race car not for a home build
Quote:
Originally Posted by unreal106
I think what your up against with the pricing is the "it works factor" people who want reliability invest in specific setups like yours and look for the ultimate compromise in an engine. Then there are the people in the "it works factor" category who simply want to build something thats fast cheap and works even if its for a short period of time. Well how does this affect you as your pricing your goods at the other people. well the people on the fence as to weather going in for a big build is worth it or they are not decided on just doing it cheaply actually bring down the pricing of the high value goods as they are constantly looking at the cheapest way of buying the most expensive part!
My view yes people will pay for the high end product however the marketing needs to be good and the contacts made who have bought need to be exploited with case studies and marketing further on there projects!
|
Cool cheers matey, it isnt a marketing piece luckily it is purelly design but ive got to throw a BOM and a short part about potential buyers etc in there. Its not aimid at selling to a mass market, more aimed along side selling them as an item to a few or in a full engine supply, something like that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by yr51ocw
280-300bar peak cylinder pressure? fuck me thats high. typical pmax for downsized boosted engines is about half that.
|
Yea it is high but the initial aim was to make something away from low power stuff. Although it is based around a PSA engine its not 100% fixed to them dimensions. A case study i read was 350pmax!
Ive ran a version of them at 250max last night after i threw this up and knocked it down to a cheaper material which i think i may stick at and just mention that another material choice can mean 300 can be ok if a few changes are made etc.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wee_monkey1987
out of question have you done some FEA analysis to prove your not going above the materials yield stress point? manufacturers will typically look at this so they can design their engine to achieve maximum efficiency and thus determine their compression ratio's and other engine design parameters without destroying the raw materials.
also partly on what unreal106 said you need to really identify your market, is the product for low, mid or high end customers. Chances are if your looking to make it profitable your more likely to succeed tackling the low end spectrum of customers due to their being the wider market, to which then it begs the question who's going to want to pay for such a product? - just some thoughts but bit of past uni advice make sure you backup your theories because lecturers will rip your ideas to shreds if they find a potential loophole in your presentation and how you answer those questions will determine how good a grade you get! good luck though looks good and where you can provide as much research and evidence as you can!
|
Yea ive done alot of FEA on it matey im sick of looking at it haha. Its definatly for a high end market i should of said when i asked more along the lines of if you were in the market to enter Le Mans or something like that for example.
I guess the more work the better too so if i get the stuff done i need done today i may run some more tests at more like 200-220pmax and see what rough costing i can see.
Cheers for the replies